Introduction, Specifications, and Pricing
VIEW GALLERY – 26 IMAGES
Along with the set of DDR4 we looked at recently, Kingston was sure to pass along some of their DDR5 for testing. While they look similar outside, what is under the hood will be much different. We get things like the included PMIC for better signaling plus voltage regulation and new ICs that pack in more speed than what was available in DDR4 kits. Not to mention that DDR5 comes with on-die ECC and that all DDR5 is read as quad-channel, even with only a pair of sticks.
Kingston’s Fury Beast DDR5 starts at 4800 MT/s just like all the rest, and as for the feature set, Kingston lists a few things worth mentioning. First comes a notation for improved stability with regard to overclocking, which is nice for those who like to surpass what the XMP 3. 0 profile offers. They also say there is usually increased efficiency, that these kits are indeed XMP a few. 0 certified, that the world’s leading motherboard manufacturers qualify them, and that they come with a low-profile heat spreader design so because not to conflict with various coolers.
With this being our first look at DDR5 from Kingston, we have no idea what to expect. However, with the rated speed and timings of this set of RAM, we do have some idea of how it should perform on our test system. Even so, with DDR5 being new and things such as locked and unlocked PMICs, all of us do have some tinkering to see just exactly what Kingston offers and exactly how well it stacks up to a couple associated with other kits we possess tested thus far. Stick around and see just how well the DDR5-5200 of Kingston Fury Beast set stands up to the competition and find out if this is the right kit for your next build.
There isn’t much information in the specifications chart we took from the product page, but all the particular vital statistics are presented. Initially, the chart covers the density of the sticks and kits, where we are shown that you can buy 8GB, 16GB, and 32GB individual sticks. For those looking for a kit, you can get 16GB, 32GB, and 64GB sets, of which we have the 32GB version. Next comes speed, and we all know that DDR5 starts at 4800 MT/s, but Kingston also offers 5200 MT/s which we have, 5600 MT/s, and even 6000 MT/s. At 4800 MT/s, the sticks come since CAS38, but for the rest, you will see them at CAS40. Voltages vary by speed as well.
To run 4200, they need just 1 . 1V, whereas the 5200 and 5600 MT/s kits require 1. 25V, and if you opt for the 6000 MT/s option, the particular XMP 3. 0 profile will set the VDIMM to 1. 35V. Operationally, you can run the Fury Beast within a temperature range from 0° to 85°C, and while not shown in the graph, these are backed with a limited lifetime warranty. The last thing shown is the size of the Fury Beast, where we can see they stand just 34. 9mm high.
More specifically, in the set associated with KF552C40BBK-32, the part number spells out quite the bit. First, these are Kingston Fury DDR5. The 52 alludes to the particular 5200 MT/s speed, whereas the C40 refers to the timings. BBK is for the color black, and the -32 describes the density. Visually, the Fury Beast has a familiar aesthetic while also being an all-new design. The aluminum heat spreaders are anodized, but the FURY found on them is made of exposed aluminum for a bit of pop against all the black.
Along with that, the Kingston name, the particular Beast series, and the notation of DDR5 are usually all expressed with white painted letters and numbers. As to the design, there are embossed shapes on the sides, as well as what appear to be ventilation holes near the particular top, along with a few notches at the top to harken back in order to older kits we now have seen in the past.
We also understand that early adopters associated with DDR5 will have to pay the hefty tax for the pleasure, but unlike the particular last set we saw at nearly $400, Kingston is keeping the cost down. So much so that they are the most affordable kit within their class. Searching through what is currently available as a 32GB kit of 5200 MT/s DDR5 upon both Amazon and Newegg, these Fury Beast kits are shown at the particular lowest price. On Amazon, the list price is definitely $193. 51, with Kingston listed as the seller, but Newegg is slightly more affordable, with a list price of $189. 07, but does come from a third-party seller. With that in mind, in case the performance does not fall on its face, Kingston is on the right path to being in more systems than the rest in this class.
Packaging and Kingston FURY Beast
Packaging for the particular Kingston Fury Beast can be simplistic but no less effective. Clear plastic regarding the clamshell packaging allows buyers to see what they are buying while protecting the RAM from damage plus static. Sealing the packaging is the black and white sticker with the name of the RAM, the site address on the front, and the particular density, speed, timings, and voltage shown in the white portion. The part number is displayed on the left as the sticker wraps around to the back, plus we also see a good Intel XMP-certified sticker.
Flipping the particular packaging on its encounter, we can see how the branding sticker seals the packaging, and it also offers a view associated with the product stickers on the RAM itself. These sticks come with a small insert that addresses the warranty and installation for those who may be unfamiliar with how they work.
An unimpeded view of these sticks shows Kingston’s angles, shapes, and designs upon the black heat spreaders. To the left, we all see the Kingston name, painted just above the exposed aluminum FURY and etched in “TM. ” To the right, we see the Beast series title, while at the top, these people ensure you know that these are DDR5 sticks.
The reverse of both sticks offers the same design elements yet lacks any naming we found on the front. What you will find is the product label near the right end. On the sticker is the part number, the serial number, the voltage required to run it at the particular XMP 3. 0 user profile, that this is one of two sticks in the kit, and that you will not get warranty support if this is removed.
As we view the top edge of the particular kit, we can observe a two-part heat spreader design, where tabs lock them together at either end. While small, Kingston does paint the FURY name on one half associated with the spreader, and even though we get why it is done this way, all of us would like it in order to have been larger and easier to read through a distance. With the lack of RGB within this set, we would like more to pop here than just the tiny FURY name.
In the previous view of this side of the stays, some of the designs and designs were tough to make out, but the lighting plus shadows in this angle make all of them much more apparent. We can also see the particular lines milled into the exposed FURY portion, which was too bright in the previous images. Lastly, the ventilation near the particular top is open on both sides and can take advantage of chassis or CPU cooler airflow to help keep them cool while in use.
While within the BIOS, we did see that the Kingston Fury Beast showed up because Micron/SpekTek, but it wasn’t until we removed one of the heat spreaders that we were sure that they were indeed Micron and not Micron rejects.
When this came time to appear at the PMIC, both were blurry and tough to read, but we believe the model number in order to be AFW85020AX704. Attempting to look it up leads us nowhere via the internet, but we assume at this time this is a locked PMIC, since voltage changes while trying to overclock lead us to a BSOD with changes in order to VDD or VDDQ.
After installing the Kingston Fury Animal into the test rig, we all find them to blend nicely with the build plus not stand out towards the sea of black. At certain angles, a person get a glint from the FURY name, and when the system is powered, the lighting reflects off of this area and shines whatever color is in the rig back into your eyes.
Test System Details
To obtain the particular AMD CPU-Z screenshots, you will see directly following this image, and this is the system we used to do it, as well as in attaining the results seen in the following pages. Thanks go out to be quiet, ASUS, and NVIDIA, for supporting this venture. Detailed specifications from the system can become found below.
After clearing CMOS before powering the system, we jumped into the BIOS to enable XMP, allowing the Fury Beast to run at their rated speed and timings. Once we opened CPU-Z, all of us saw that they run at 5200 MHz along with 40-40-40-80 2T timings. Voltages were 1. 25V for that VDD and VDDQ, while the IMC voltage was arranged at 1. 19V.
While we all set the default XMP profile, we noticed there was a second option, which adds a bit more compatibility. You have the option to run the Fury Beast in 4800 MHz, but this particular time the timings are slightly reduced to 38-38-38-70 2T while using the identical voltages to the main XMP profile.
While we could not really add any speed to the kit, we could tinker using the timings a bit. While opting to move back to the default 5200 MHz, we got the timings down in order to 36-38-38-80 2T, with the particular voltages listed above, as any changes to either the VDD or the VDDQ would render the system inoperable with a BSOD every time we changed them. We were able to address the IMC voltage, but it did not affect what we could attain.
Chad’s AMD DDR5 Dual-Channel Test System Specifications
Intel Performance
Just because a heads up, we added the particular best runs from our own old DDR4 charts. All of us did so as the temporary measure which enables one to reference the old setup results compared to what this newer CPU architecture and DDR5 offer over what you are used to seeing from us. As the charts populate with more DDR5 examples, the “Best of Old Charts – DDR4” results will be removed.
Using CPU-Z to obtain an angle on exactly how the memory plays into single-core CPU performance testing, we find that the Fury Beast does rather properly. The XMP1 results are very similar to the much faster XPG Lancer RGB, and we can see that will opting for XMP2 failed to lose much performance compared to XMP1. However, the best results were obtained by lowering the timings a touch more, which takes the Fury Beast past the particular 6000 MHz XPG outcomes.
Read bandwidth in AIDA64 is a slightly different story. While the Kingston Rage RGB performed as we expected for each associated with the three options, all of us would have assumed it to keep up with the non-descript 5200 C38 run. Even so, we all can see that XMP1 is tuned quite well along with the 79340 MB/s result. XMP2 took quite a hit with a loss of 5919 MB/s in comparison to XMP1, and with a bit of tuning, we were able to gain 1361 MB/s over XMP1 along with very little effort.
The results of the write performance test are usually a bit more in line with what we would have got expected to see. XMP1 lands us at 73480 MB/s, just behind the particular 5200 C38 run. The particular XMP2 results were slightly less than we expected, with a drop in performance of 4808 MB/s compared to the XMP1 results. We are pleased to see that at 5200 MHz using 36-38-38-80 2T timings, we surpassed the 5200 C38 results and gained another 754 MB/s over XMP1.
Along with AIDA64, copy performance is certainly said to be the particular metric most similar in order to real-life experience, and in that vein, we can notice the Fury Beat do reasonably well. Starting along with the XMP1 run, we landed at 71340 Megabytes per second, which isn’t horrible. However, opting for XMP2 takes a huge hit within performance, to the tune of a loss of 3845 MB/s. To9 brighten things up, we then appearance to the reduced timings run, where we had been able to gain another 1062 MB/s, but were still surpassed by the 5200 C38 kit results in the chart.
When it came to latency reported in AIDA64, a person can see that Kingston did not tune these types of kits as well since some of the others but was still able to hang close in the previous results. While our reduced timings settings netted the best result, XMP1 isn’t a slouch either., Nevertheless, opting for XMP2 lands these at the bottom of the chart.
Super Pi shows the Fury Beast within a much better light, with the XMP1 outcomes topping the chart with the shortest time in order to completion. Even the XMP2 results are impressive, considering they are less than five seconds slower than the particular XPG Lancer RGB. Tinkering with the kit is something that Super Pi does not like, as this falls towards the lowest of the three results.
The physics score portion of 3DMArk Fire Strike scales as one might expect. The XMP2 results were the lowest in the three but still in line with the speed and timings of almost all the kits listed. XMP1 did better than expected, plus while there wasn’t the huge gain, lowering the timings did deliver the particular best results for this RAM.
PCMark 10 may not be the end-all for testing, but it does offer a wide variety of testing types to show how well RAM is suited intended for various tasks. To say we are a little bit shocked at these results is a bit of an understatement. Both XMP1 and XMP2 results top all the particular other kits in the chart, and if you like to tinker, you have gained some points.
File compression is something many users will end up being doing with their techniques, and using 7-Zip and a near 8GB file, we can see just how well the Fury Beast does here. We all fully expected the XPG Lancer RGB to tp the chart versus the XMP1 and XMP2 results, but the gap is smaller than we assumed. We also never thought that reducing the timings would sail for the top of the particular chart, but they have.
Cinebench R23 will be something we see many using to test one CPU to another and how nicely the RAM is tuned. Again, we see that Kingston tuned this kit well to get such a test, along with the XMP1 and XMP2 results landing at the top of the graph. Tinkering with the package did lose us several performance, but only somewhat, and may not be the best option for those looking for the greatest in Cinebench.
For those who transcode video files, we look to Handbrake to sort out which is the particular best in this type of environment. To our utter shock, we find that will the Kingston Fury Beast lands at the best of our chart once again. While the difference in the three runs shows a three-second distinction from best to XMP2, there is a wider gap in time to the next best kit, which is shockingly the XPG Lancer RGB.
Final Thoughts
Regarding initial impressions with the Kingston Fury Beast DDR5, we will say there is a familiarity with many associated with the past kits we certainly have seen. The styling, the color, and the exposed aluminium FURY on the sides remind us of other Fury kits, even down to the white painted names also found around the heat spreaders. This early in the DDR5 game, we do not expect much room to tinker, but actually so, since Kingston did not bin these within an inch of stability, we did have a bit of room to lower the particular timings and have a little more fun than simply running the XMP options. On top of that, even without the velocity or timings of some of the other entries, the Fury Beast has been able to hold its own and even top the few of the charts, which says a lot about what you are getting for the money involved.
We never saw the temperature go beyond 46°C in just about all our tests on an open-air system without fans pointing at the RAM. For many, who will be using these kits inside a chassis, thermals can be considerably lower. All around, all of us do feel that presently there is a nice mix of performance and styling, and even with the lack of RGB in order to accompany this version of the Fury Beast DDR5, we didn’t miss it. With this much overall performance, enough to take upon much faster kits within the charts, and the design that is designed into the warmth spreaders, we feel that will Kingston is onto some thing with the Fury Animal and is a kit that offers quite a bit of bang for the particular buck.
Considering in many instances that the Rage Beast could run near or surpass the nearly $400 set of XPG Lancer RGB sticks at half the cost says simply about all you need to know. Even when RGB is a must, the premium is not worth it in our minds.
Even with soaring prices around the globe, the Kingston Fury Beast is the most affordable of all of the 5200 MHz CAS40 32GB kits says a lot and is the major factor in the particular mass acceptance of such a product. While $193. 51 seems a little bit steep, many DDR4 32 GB kits will cost a person nearly the same. The fact that you can enjoy the benefits of DDR5 from a similar cost states a ton. It is usually a lot of the reason we will be recommending Kingston to anyone within the market for affordable, well-performing, yet stylish DDR5 for their new Z690 build or for future AM5 thoughts.